Yesterday, I was searching for words to describe my system building approach to a customer.

I started off with a description of attributes I consider to be non-negotiable - tone color, dynamics, transient speed, that sort of thing.

The idea of risk-taking occurred to me ...

Taking Risks ...

As I was describing it to him, I reflected on performers and performances that move me.

I'd much rather watch a risk-taking virtuoso who traverses out on a "musical tightrope" in hopes of witnessing something special than to attend a "safe", "tidy" performance - a performance that could have been phoned in.

I hadn't thought of the parallel to my system building approach, but in retrospect, it was obvious.

A System Building Example ...

I've been a fan of high efficiency systems driven by directly heated triode amplifiers for some two decades.  My early experiments were somewhat flawed, and some might say that they bordered on being overly aggressive.

It took a bit of work to tame these first efforts, and of course, it's all about making trade-offs no matter what your approach is.   For me, the potential for stunning dynamics, vivid tone colors, and lightning fast transients outweighed an occasional flaw. 

I listen to complex, rhythmically challenging music, whether it be 20th Century string quartets, bluegrass, gypsy jazz, or Afro-Carribean jazz, and a system that can't follow the complex layering and rhythms of these musical forms is all but worthless to me.  Others couldn't tolerate the choices I made, and I get that.

The good news (for me and for Galibier) is that my system configuration has reached a point of no compromise, and people with different system biases from mine, can sit down and enjoy it on its own terms.

There's a powerful argument for building up a system conservatively, and I would not argue against it, any more than I would advocate my risk-taking  approach.

At the end of the day, there can be a convergence toward a shared vision born out of our personal aesthetics.

There's more ...

In part-2, I expand on this and how this relates to system tuning - from the perspective of setting up your turntable.

Related Posts

Distortion vs. Perception

This rant is long overdue … We’ve long maintained that designing an audio component and setting up a system is a blend of art and science. Too much emphasis on one over the other is doomed to failure. We also contend that until the “Holodeck” is invented (and with it, the perfect illusion), audio systems are about

Read More

Setup Methodology: SRA vs. Azimuth

We knew that peeling the wrapper off Version 1 of AnalogMagik software would lead us down the rabbit hole of studying setup parameter interactions.  This is a topic we continually think about without any prodding, and any new tool has us revisiting and challenging our assumptions.  If you’ve downloaded one of our setup guides, you’re well

Read More

Choosing the Right Headshell

Arché Headshell In an earlier post, we discussed tonearms, and why two individuals with identical tastes and systems might be best suited to two different tonearms. It all boils down to the fact that tonearms are tools that we interact with, and two people my have different preferences in this regard. As with tonearms, you may achieve

Read More

A One Handed Watch?

So, an ad popped up on my feed – single handed wrist watches. Who would have thought this was thing, and what does this have to do with Hi-Fi?

Read More

Thom


Your Signature

Never miss a good story!

 Subscribe to our newsletter to receive a copy of a setup report we created for a customer.

Subscribers also receive discounts on all accessories, including Audiodesk, Feickert and AnalogMagik


This report is in 3 sections:  


15 pages packed with general setup information - tricks you may not have seen before

Documentation of the customer's setup

A tool guide - how to specify a USB microscope and build your own azimuth gauge


Click the photo below, to subscribe.

Click for Free Setup Report